Even as the number of females processed through juvenile courts climbs
steadily, an implicit consensus remains among scholars in criminal justice that
male adolescents define the delinquency problem in the United States. We
suggest two reasons why this view persists. First, female adolescents are
accused primarily of victimless crimes, such as truancy, that do not involve
clear-cut damage to persons or property. If committed by adults, these actions
are not even considered prosecutable; if committed by juvenile males, they have
traditionally been looked on leniently by the courts. Thus, ironically, the
plight of female delinquents receives little scrutiny because they are accused
of committing relatively minor offenses. Second, the courts have long justified
so-called preventive intervention into the lives of young females viewed as
antisocial with the rationale that women are especially vulnerable. Traditional
stereotypes of women as the weaker and more dependent sex have led to earlier
intervention and longer periods of misdirected supervision for female
delinquents than for males.
No comments:
Post a Comment